There’s absolutely nothing wrong with reading secondary literature. Of course you could be a Marxist and apply a single philosophical theory to every case, but what I’d prefer in a democracy is politicians who are prepared to think on their feet about changing situations, rather than just apply a ready-made theory and read off the conclusions. Gregory Sadler is the president of ReasonIO, the editor of Stoicism Today, a speaker, writer, and a producer of highly popular YouTube videos on classic and contemporary philosophy. It’s not just him preaching, he gives arguments for his positions. Sandel is primarily a political philosopher.

Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics3. I start all of my students off with primary texts. Here, Nigel Warburton, our philosophy editor and co-host of the Philosophy Bites podcast, picks his favourites and explains what he likes about them. Obviously, philosophy is very rigorous and helps train one to think critically. Each of them is a kind of genre, and is restricted by the scope of that format. I’m also incorporating insights from conversations with a number of people about the philosophical texts they studied, enjoyed, hated, found incomprehensible, thought brilliant, and everything in between. Reading Epictetus, rather than just reading contemporary Stoic literature about the guy, will open up Stoicism to you like nothing else — just for one example.

To resolve these questions, we need to think about the ultimate purpose – what Aristotle would call the telos – of golf. Best of all, they are (hopefully) designed for first-time students with no background in philosophy. There are points to argue in favor of Seneca or Marcus Aurelius, but when it comes down to it, my judgement is that Epictetus just is the better choice. How did you first become interested in philosophy? It’s useful to start by considering common anxieties or preoccupations that many seem to have.

Pettit was actually invited in to assess Zapatero’s government according to the philosophical principles of republicanism. Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen:, ist ein Shop GmbH & Co. KG Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str.

There is no basic conflict running down the ages between Platonist idealists and Aristotelian realists, between empiricists and rationalists, between collectivists and libertarians, or whatever other good guys and bad guys (since such narratives inevitably lurch in that direction). There’s a young child drowning in the pond and his head’s just about to go underwater. He believes most of us could be much more generous at very little cost to our own lives, and that the result of this would be of huge measurable benefit to mankind. Read Anselm is better known for his Proslogion (which contains one version of what has come to be called the “ontological argument”) and for his Cur Deus Homo (which contains an innovative and influential account of the atonement and incarnation).

I also give them a pep talk about their own capacities to read those works — which tends to be needed for some — and I make sure to provide them with lots of support in the form of lectures, discussions, exercises and examples, handouts, videos, lesson pages, etc. Reading it, you’ll not only be introduced to a number of important concepts and distinctions in ethics, but also to views on human nature, social and political organization, and even the range of relationships he calls friendships.

So did you really get into the subject at university?

Singer is incredibly consistent in his positions. Instead, there’s just a pattern of overlapping resemblances between the things we happen to call games. If you don’t follow this rule, you might well end up reading Hegel and being upset with him for not placing everything into the “thesis-antithesis-synthesis” schema some hack told you Hegelian philosophy was all about! It is perfectly fine to read Aristotle before reading Plato. In the introduction to the book, Nagel writes, “There isn’t much you can assume or take for granted. I’ll say one other thing about the importance of sooner or later getting to primary texts — I hope that it is sooner! Is the book for children as well as adults? It showed me that philosophy isn’t nitpicking or school debating societies, but rather a subject that gets right to the heart of what matters. In addition, he smartly uses bullet points to break down major philosophical arguments into their core aspects. Do you think the title might give readers false expectations? Do you think, given the success of your podcast series Philosophy Bites, that there has been increased interest in philosophy over the past 30 years? I actually went to Bristol University to study psychology, but I became a bit disillusioned with it and dropped out. I would walk several miles to the local library and take out as many books as I could. At least that is not the case with the philosophy classics.

Most university teachers would say you don’t really need an introduction, you can just go and read Hume or Descartes or Mill.

**Preis der gedruckten Ausgabe (Gebundenes Buch). Her Vindication of the Rights of Women is an excellent work within the virtue ethics traditions, and remains quite accessible to the contemporary reader. I was thinking, “How would you introduce philosophy to someone who didn’t know anything about it?” I think the central question in philosophy is, “How should we live?” And that’s a question about which Peter Singer has a lot to say. It’s got the authority of him being a significant philosopher in his own right, but if you had no idea who he was it wouldn’t matter. Since then, this book has stood the test of time as a clear guide to what philosophy is and how to philosophize. So I thought given these recommendations from eminent philosophers, there must be something to it. * * Provides the tools new students need to tackle philosophicalarguments themselves * Clearly presents and explains contemporary issues and currentdebates * Covers the key areas of philosophy, including perception,epistemology, metaphysics, the mind, philosophy of religion, ethicsand…mehr. It actually exemplifies some of what it’s arguing for. This page was last edited on 14 November 2017, at 15:38. It’s a nice short book that deserves to be better known. She’s rightly viewed as a feminist, since she carried out some cultural analysis still largely relevant today, and made a strong case for equality between women and men. He’d rather die of starvation than give that up. But I hammer the point home that, when we are studying philosophy, we are focusing on the thinkers themselves, reading their actual works, discussing ideas drawn directly from their texts, and making them communicate their insights to us in the present. Often all it takes is a second reading to realize how much you missed the first time around. Singer is a counter-example to the stereotype of the philosopher in an ivory tower, whose life makes no difference, who leaves everything as it is. We NEED introductions to philosophy. What we want for this sort of list is precisely the opposite. Mary Wollstonecraft is a relatively underappreciated writer, working right at the cusp between the early modern period and the 19th century that she didn’t get to see. He’s not saying you have to live in a sackcloth and give away all your possessions. Every year, the Booker Prize judges whittle a year's worth of fiction down to a shortlist of six books, each competing for the title of the best novel of the year. And different readers are going to come away with different things — usually a mishmash of some rightly understood points and other mistakenly mixed up ideas — when reading the same texts. Glover was an important part of a movement towards looking at real-life problems. Read


Yet in our everyday lives, we know that through inaction we are allowing children to die of poverty who could otherwise be saved by a minimal contribution – less than the price of an expensive pair of shoes.