While they had originally included aspects of Hinduism, by then, they had evolved into unique religions with their own customs, traditions, and rituals. Significantly, it stipulated that the Hindu Code would apply to anyone who was not a Muslim, Parsi, Christian or Jew, and asserted that all Hindus would be governed under a uniform law. Google's free service instantly translates words, phrases, and web pages between English and over 100 other languages.

When it became clear that the vast majority of Hindus did not support the Bills, he insisted that though they were a minority, those who supported the Bills were modern and progressive and so held vital weight in the Hindu community, in importance if not in numbers. After publication in twelve regional languages and a wide publicity campaign, the Rau Committee toured the country and examined witnesses.



[11] However, it was the passing of the Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act (Deshmukh Act) in 1937, which had given the widow a son's share in property that was one of the most substantial steps towards the Hindu Code Bill.

Therefore, they were a direct contradiction to the policy of noninterference and would mean the government was meddling in personal law. The Hindu code bills were several laws passed in the 1950s that aimed to codify and reform Hindu personal law in India.

[5], They are also still contentious among many communities, including women's, nationalist and religious groups.

"[26] They also felt that should equal property rights be given to women, the Mitākṣarā concept of a joint family would crumble, as would the foundation of Hindu society. He also argued that because the bill's supporters were progressive, those who dissented would eventually change their position when confronted with the realities of modernity.

They also insisted that if daughters and wives were given inheritance, more conflicts would arise within families.

She also argues for a gender-equal framework of rights that covers the "public" domain of work (maternity benefits, equal wages) and is available to all Indian citizens, thus avoiding a direct confrontation with communities and communal politics.

[19], Conflicts also arose from the categorization of who would be considered Hindu. [1] However, the Nehru administration saw such codification as necessary to unify the Hindu community, which ideally would be a first step towards unifying the nation. See what's new with book lending at the Internet Archive, Uploaded by

[5] The result 1947 report of the committee included and went far beyond the 1941 proposals, recommending the abolition of the joint-family property system, the introduction of the daughter's simultaneous succession with the son to the father's estate, the abolition of the barrier to intercaste marriages, the assimilation of civil and sacramental marriages, and the introduction of divorce for the higher castes. The Dharmaśāstra—the textual authority on matters of marriage, adoption, the joint family, minorities, succession, religious endowments, and caste privileges—has often been seen as the private law of the Hindus.

Certain feminists thus argue that the uniform civil code debate balances on the polarity of the state and community, rendering the gender-based axis upon which it turns, invisible.

[11], The 1941 Report was accompanied by two draft bills, each of which was laid before a select committee of both houses of the legislature. [17] It was the intention of the government that this first draft should become law on 1 January 1948, but the whole project was temporarily suspended when independence led to the priorities of the legislature to be consumed with the task of creating the new regime. to Kannada However, whatever is known and interpreted about this Hindu law is a jumble of rules, often inconsistent and incompatible with one another, that are lacking in uniformity.[5].

The Code established "Hindu" to be a negative category that would include all those who did not identify as a Muslim, Jew, Christian, or Parsi.

The integration of Hindus into a homogeneous society could best be done by enacting an all-embracing code which encompasses within its fold every sect, caste, and religious denomination.

Social progress and modernization could only be achieved by fundamental reforms, which recognized gender equality. Realizing that he would have to make significant concessions to get the bill passed, Nehru suggested that the proposed law be split into several sections. [22] Nehru split the Code Bill into four separate bills, including the Hindu Marriage Act, the Hindu Succession Act, the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, and the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act. It also "established one joint family system of property ownership for all Hindus" by doing away with regional rules. Finally, it allotted portions of inheritance to daughters, while giving widows complete property rights where they had previously been restricted.

In her 1998 article "State, Gender, Community: Citizenship in Contemporary India", she calls for more support and initiation for reform within all personal laws and more legislation in areas that are not covered by secular or personal laws, such as domestic violence.

capacity to have an effect on the character, development, or behaviour of Ganesh says Competition Commission of India (CCI) allowing dubbing of content to Kannada last year was a major victory. He told the Constituent Assembly they would contend with only the first 55 clauses concerning marriage and divorce, while the rest would be considered by the Parliament of India after the first general election.

In the face of such vocal opposition, Nehru had to justify the passage of the Hindu code bills. treasury meaning in kannada: ಖಜಾನೆ | Learn detailed meaning of treasury in kannada dictionary with audio prononciations, definitions and usage. Supporters largely sought to convince the public that the bills did not stray far from classical Hindu personal law. They argued that practices such as divorce were absolutely not condoned by Hinduism. [20], The draft that Ambedkar submitted to the Constituent Assembly was opposed by several sections of lawmakers. In a letter that he released to the press, he held that his decision was largely based on the treatment that had been accorded to the Hindu Code Bill as well as the administration's inability to get it passed. [26], The application of the Hindu Code Bills have been controversial in determining who is to be called a Hindu and who is entitled to be exempted from certain rules of Hindu law. Therefore, the codification of Hindu personal law became a symbolic beginning on the road to establishing the Indian national identity.

Published in Mangalore by the Basel Mission Book & Tract Depository, 1894.

"[23], Nehru's primary purpose in instituting the Hindu code bills was to unify the Hindu community.so it made sense to define Hindu in the broadest possible sense. Numerous organizations were formed to lobby for the defeat of the bills and massive amounts of literature were distributed throughout the Hindu population.